Sourceforge project site
Freshmeat project site
This is a little project, I, Corvus V Corax (Eric Noack), started on 11.25.2002, in a hurry, and then somehow started to be stuck on it ;-)
So what is it?
Motiontrack is a set of executables which can be used to detect motions of objects between 2 images, by comparing them pixelwise, or check whether 2 images show the same or not.
Motiontrack is a backend tool, to use in your own scripts, together with other tools to get the images from a webcam, like v4lctl, an apache server to host them, ...
Motiontrack is no all around motiontracking kill'em'all program that does everything
from grabbing the video input to web-serving it ...
if you look for this, better check out motion
What will it be?
Future plans are to be able to recognize the objects that are or have been moving with these tools.
Early pattern detection has just been implemented to some ASCII art conversion,
and to auto-align images.
Future versions might be able to interpret groups of simple geometric patterns (arcs, circles, lines of different angle and width, ..., detected with such routine or its successor) as objects, and identify them, if trained accordingly (neural net programming and such)
What is this good for?
If u use a webcam to scan a specific area, for example, and you want to save the pictures
which show something or someone going on, and delete the images with no action,
or if you want to check if you should start recording a movie showing an intruder robbing your house,
without having to record 24/7 and wasting disk space with dumb data, this is what u want.
Just take 2 images with a delay of 1 second, every now and then, and check them for any changes between them. If there are any, you have action and should take measures, if not just delete the identical images and keep idling.
The problem is, that just comparing the images pixel for pixel always will result in some changes, since light is an analogue data source, and you always will have some flicker, clutter, snow storm, what ever, which creates changes in the image files.
So u have to check wheather your movement was a real object in sight moving, or just random pixel changes
Specially with low quality data this might get difficult. So u need a good program to check this for you:
... motiontrack ...
! Please don't use this software to help monitor places ! ! where it impairs the privacy of other people, like ! ! monitoring public places and streets, CCTV, voyeurism...! ! http://www.stop1984.org -- against total surveillance! !
How can i use it
You can find documentation here
What do i need?
You currently need either a working version of libgd,
or ImageMagick installed on your system.
You will compile this under Unix or Linux, which meens you have to be used to the usual configure, make, make install sequence, which means that you need something like the gcc C Compiler (mac OS CC works, too), Gnu make, and the other usual stuff.
If ./configure doesnt work like you want, build a new one with ./autogen.sh (need's autoconf, automake and that stuff)
./configure now provides the --with-searchdirs=<DIR>:<DIR>:... option,
to specify additional prefixes where your libs might be installed.
Also you can use standard ENV variables like CFLAGS, CPPFLAGS, C_INCLUDE_PATH, ... to help it
Ah yes. You need a webcam, and a method to get some images from it. I use v4lctl for this. (comes with XawTV)
What License is it?
Guess what? GPL of course! Version 2 or above.
Who did it?
Motiontrack? Me. Thats
Corvus V Corax.
aka Eric Noack
And where the hell can i get it?
Oh darn. i almost forgot:
here it is ! the sources :)) If you want an rpm, make one and give me ;)
Sourceforge cvs frontend to really actual sources is here
Anon CVS Server access via cvs -z3 -d:pserver:firstname.lastname@example.org:/cvsroot/motiontrack/ co motion
NEW: As per request of some guy in alt.ascii-art:
motiontrack-0.1.3-win32bin.zip experimental stage windows binaries - not thoroughly tested, use at own risk
Can i have some screenshots how it works?
Yes of course here they are:
These are 2 images taken with my real low quality webcam of me moving my hand,
and a lot of background clutter
(This is an incomplete process, motiontrack can do more meanwhile, but what would be the fun of it if you dont try youself?)
Now i run mdiffer webcam1.jpg webcam2.jpg diffs.jpg
Now i run menhance diffs.jpg enh.jpg
And finally i run msectors enh.jpg sectors.jpg
Console output of sectors is :
This program is free software created and to be distributed under the GPL!
The Authors or distributors provide NO WARRANTY for anything!
You should have recieved and read a copy of the GPL v2 or higher!
! Please don't use this software to help monitor places !
! where it impairs the privacy of other people, like !
! monitoring public places and streets, CCTV, voyeurism...!
! http://www.stop1984.org -- against total surveillance! !
Overall sector count:
11,4:85 13,4:69 11,5:62 11,6:68 17,6:80 18,6:71 11,7:61 17,7:84
Where only the "8" and the x,y:f goes to stdout and the rest goes to stderr
The 8 meens that only 8 sectors in sectors.jpg are more than 20%+25 brighter than the average sector!
But this is enough!
Without movement, no matter how bad the quality is, we have only random move-data, and no sector ever reaches more than 120%+25 average brightness
any value over 0, no matter how small meens we have movement. for sure :))
IMPORTANT:Depending on your version of motiontrack, libGD or ImageMagick,
you run the process in one shot via "motiontrack", or in single steps with
in-between images, and not-loss-free compression algos like in jpg,
the amount of "motionsecors" and their position can vary even with the same
If you want to check if your local compilation of motiontrack
works, trust your eyes by watching the images created by the different process
steps (here: diffs.jpg , enh.jpg and sectors.jpg)! They should look like the
one you find here, but they wont be identical i guess.
Some older versions of libPNG and libGD on some distributions had bugs and
such you might get random or garbage images instead, but you will notice that,
when you compare them to those here.
This is a little confusing but i cant do much about it, sorry.
If that bug happens upgrade to the latest librarys.
What if i want help developing, is there any code documentation?
There is some. Right in the header files there are short function descriptions.
But for a whole project overview you should first read TheCode.txt!